Any conversation about which legal processes are prime candidates for outsourcing must also include evaluating work that is less suitable for outsourcing.
Obviously, LegalEase Solutions believes wholeheartedly in the value of targeted legal process outsourcing, but by the same token it would be disingenuous not to acknowledge that some legal work is not efficiently outsourced.
A quick review of work that is successfully and efficiently outsourced provides some broad-stroke common traits: the work is typically less complex, more repetitive, and provides time and cost efficiencies.
Conversely, it follows to reason that the first area of work that is best kept solely in-house are cases dealing with complex, uniquely fact-driven subject matter. A prime example would be IP litigation.
Work that has a very high level of complexity and case-specific data can practically become its own field of study, which means that the amount of time required to bring outside attorneys up to speed would outweigh the potential reduction in costs.
If you are an attorney who has identified additional legal work that is not appropriate for outsourcing, feel free to contribute to the discussion in the comments area.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment