Support For Solo Practitioners

Last week the ABA rolled out new online support for solo practitioners. They tout their new Smart Soloing Center as "an online resource that is the latest in its growing portfolio of products and services designed for sole practitioners."

The Smart Soloing Center includes:

The Solo Blog Network, featuring posts from some of the most insightful lawyers who are writing about the joys and challenges of solo practice.

• Articles drawn from the ABA’s dozens of substantive law magazines.

• The most popular discussions from SoloSez, the ABA’s free e-mail discussion list for solo practitioners.

• The latest news about solos and small firms from the daily feed of the ABA Journal.

• Links to a wide variety of websites for solos.

ABA President Carolyn Lamm acknowledges that “solos need things other lawyers don’t."

Here at LegalEase, we are also keenly aware that solo practitioners have their own set of needs. Which is why we offer legal support services like document/contract review, deposition summaries, and legal research/writing .

Our legal support is scalable, allowing solo practitioners to navigate heavy loads as well as giving solos the opportunity to accept larger cases they would otherwise have to refer elsewhere.

And our cost structure is designed to be the most efficient alternative for solo practitioners. But don't just take our word for it; read what others have to say.

Ethics Opinion on Cloud Computing

After a request from a member of their bar association, The North Carolina Bar studied the ethics of using cloud computing -- also known as Software-as-a-Service or SaaS -- in a law firm, and they've finished drafting a proposed Formal Ethics Opinion on the matter.

The American Bar Association's Legal Technology Resource Center describes SaaS computing as the following:

"SaaS is distinguished from traditional software in several ways. Rather than installing the software to your computer or the firm's server, SaaS is accessed via a web browser (like Explorer or Firefox) over the internet. Data is stored on the vendor's data center rather than the firm's computers."

The North Carolina Ethics Opinion clearly states the central question:

"SaaS for law firms may involve the storage of a law firm's data, including client files..., on remote servers rather than on the law firm's own computers and, therefore, outside the direct control of the firm's lawyers. Given the duty to safeguard confidential client information... may a law firm use SaaS?"

The Ethics Opinion concluded that SaaS computing is acceptable by lawyers and law firms, provided that:

1) "Steps are taken effectively to minimize the risk of inadvertent or unauthorized disclosure of confidential client information and to protect client property, including file information, from risk of loss...

Although a lawyer has a professional obligation to protect confidential information from unauthorized disclosure, the Ethics Committee has long held that this duty does not compel any particular mode of handling confidential information nor does it prohibit the employment of vendors whose services may involve the handling of documents or data containing client information. "

2) The law firm should be able to answer a number of questions, including:

• Who has access to the data besides the lawyer?

• Who owns the data -- the lawyer or the SaaS vendor?

• How does the SaaS vendor, or any third party hosting company, safeguard the physical and electronic security and confidentiality of stored data.

• Where is the data hosted? Is it in a country with less rigorous protections against unlawful search and seizure?

• If the SaaS vendor goes out of business, will the lawyer have access to the data and the software or source code?

• How often and on how many geographically distinct servers does the data get backed up?
  

As a Legal Process Outsourcing company with years of experience in data security on third party servers, the North Carolina Bar Association's opinion seems entirely pragmatic.

"...the Ethics Committee concludes that a law firm may use SaaS if reasonable care is taken effectively to minimize the risks to the confidentiality and to the security of client information and client files. However, the law firm is not required to guarantee that the system will be invulnerable to unauthorized access."

A Lesson from the Engineers

Marketplace, a radio program run on many NPR stations, recently discussed how the sour economy was eliminating engineering jobs at a faster rate than many other professionals, with high profile companies looking to offshore their engineers.

Obviously, this sounds very familiar to legal professionals.

Interestingly, the American Society of Civil Engineers read the writing on the wall long enough ago to start revising their Body of Knowledge, which was created in a 1998 policy statement to define prerequisites for licensure and practice.

Last year the ASCE published Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century, Preparing The Civil Engineer for the Future, Second Edition.

The purpose of the book is to acknowledge new professional challenges and identify improvements to the education and licensure process. The book states:

"The manner in which civil engineering is practiced must change. That change is necessitated by such forces as globalization, sustainability requirements, emerging technology, and increased complexity with the corresponding need to identify, define, and solve problems at the boundaries of traditional disciplines."

Again, to those following the legal profession, there is a familiar echo: Globalization. Emerging technology. Problem solving at the boundaries of traditional disciplines.

Of equal importance, the ASCE also includes a telling word choice in one of their stated goals for the book.

" [to] focus on outcomes to the proposed changes in the way civil engineering is taught and learned, including the knowledge, skills and attitudes necessary for entry into professional practice."

Pretty striking. The American Society of Civil Engineers -- not a group historically known as wild-eyed, knee-jerk, doom sayers -- is 1) stating that the manner in which they practice their profession must change and, 2) suggesting that a change in attitude is a key component to succeeding in the 21st.

As attorneys peer into the coming years, it might not be a bad idea to steal a page from the ASCE's Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century and acknowledge that a change in attitude may be a successful strategy to address the challenges of globalization, emerging technology, and problem solving at the boundaries of traditional disciplines.